While there are many
implications of divorce, women are often the
financial victims of divorce due to the lack of
equal pay for equal work in many countries and the
fact that many women give up employment after
marriage to rear children. They are often left with
the burden of looking after the children after the
divorce while having to find work in low-paid jobs.
Child support collection is a major problem as many
fathers do not accept that they have an obligation
towards their children. Many national and local
governments provide some kind of welfare system for
divorced mothers and their children.
Men are generally the financial victims of divorce due to court-ordered alimony and child support which women often are not required to pay, and the fact that many men are entirely denied custody of their own children. Some men are left with the burden of never seeing their children, which is a major problem as many mothers may relocate the children, not accepting that they have an obligation to provide a stable and supportive family with both parents involved. Although women are less likely to pay child-support, they are more likely to neglect support payments when they are required. Unfortunately, the aspect of family stability is one argument stated against same-sex marriage, since court orders against men and child neglect by women are no longer defensible one-way legal benefits. Recognition of the problems faced by fathers and other relatives is given by self-help groups such as Families Need Fathers.
The fact that women often receive primary custody of their children means that some men are are unable to see their children as frequently as they would like, and this is particularly difficult if one ex-spouse or the other moves. Currently in the US, federal law makes non-payment of child support an automatic felony, whereas a mother's refusal to let the father see his children in accordance with court decisions is not an act criminalized by the federal government.
In the USA, a spouse who resides in a community property state and lacks a prenuptial agreement is at a disadvantage if he or she earns more than the other spouse. In these states, the property is split 50/50 regardless of who earned the money. Thus, the spouse who would be the least well off on their own receives unearned money, property, and/or other assets upon the divorce settlement. Theoretically, a spouse with zero assets would get 50 percent of the other spouse's assets (possibly not counting pre-marriage assets and inheritance), while two spouses equally wealthy would both keep their share. This is true even if the poorer spouse has committed adultery or initiates the divorce
them self. Judges have no power to rectify the situation, and must divide the property evenly no matter how unfair the result may seem. This can generally be avoided if both parties enter into a prenuptial agreement before marriage, though courts sometimes overturn these agreements. While men have traditionally had more assets than women and were negatively affected by community property laws, nowadays more and more women are the wealthier spouse, and are affected as well. Most states in the USA are not community property states. However, some large and populous ones such as California, along with a few smaller ones, are community property states.
In some jurisdictions, only a small minority of divorces involve families with children. For example, in Scotland in 1997, there were 2461 divorces involving children but 9761 of couples with no children under 16.
Emotional Implications of Divorce
• This RSS Feed URL Is Deprecated
This RSS feed URL is deprecated, please update. New URLs can be found in the footers at https://news.google.com/news
• Bitcoin And Cryptocurrency In Divorce Proceedings Lexology
Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency in Divorce Proceedings Lexology This interesting article looks at some of the implications of Bitcoin and blockchain technology on divorce law. Bitcoin has burst into public consciousness in the past few weeks as values have shot past 10,000 per Bitcoin. There are now in excess of
• Exhusband Forged Documents To Hide Millions In B.C. Divorce Case CBC.ca
CBC.ca Ex husband forged documents to hide millions in B.C. divorce case CBC.ca A woman who was earning just 900 a month working in a hotel laundry while her then husband concealed a fortune has been awarded nearly 1.3 million in spousal support. and more raquo
• Opinion Today: An Amicable Brexit Divorce Financial Times Financial Times
Financial Times Opinion today: An amicable Brexit divorce Financial Times Financial Times This article is from today39s FT Opinion email. Sign up to receive a daily digest of the big issues straight to your inbox. Commentators routinely refer to the money Britain is paying as part of its negotiations to leave the EU as the divorce bill and more raquo
• What Does Theresa Mayaposs Loss On The Brexit Bill Mean Financial Times
Financial Times What does Theresa May39s loss on the Brexit bill mean Financial Times a major defeat on Wednesday when 11 members of her Conservative party rebelled to force her to give parliament more control over Brexit. The prime minister39s setback prompted recriminations from pro Brexit Conservatives, who accused the rebels of The Latest: UK39s May says committed to 39orderly39 BrexitWichita Eagle Theresa May heads to EU summit with diminished authority after Brexit vote defeatEvening Echo Cork Brexit Diaries 21: David Davis and the struggles of a ministerDeutsche Welle BreakingNews.ie all 1,353 news articles raquo
NOTICE: This webpage is
Copyrighted content. No portion of this page may be copied
to any other webpage, forum, blog or other domain page or
offline publication without written permission from
FactsOfLaw.com. Violators will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
The information provided by FactsOfLaw.com does not
constitute legal advice or any other type of advice and is
provided for educational purposes only without warranty of any
kind. FactsOfLaw.com has not reviewed the information on this
page for accuracy and is not responsible for any errors,
omissions or inaccuracies. For legal advice you should
consult a licensed attorney.