criminal case, the government generally brings charges in one of two ways: either by accusing a suspect directly in a "bill of information" or other similar document, or by bringing evidence before a grand jury to allow that body to determine whether the case should proceed. If there is, then the defendant is indicted. In the federal system, a case must be brought before a grand jury for indictment if it is to proceed; some states, however, do not require indictment. Once charges have been brought, the case is then brought before a petit jury, or is tried by a judge if the defense requests it. The jury is selected from a pool by the prosecution and defense.
The burden of proof is on the prosecution in a criminal trial, which must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty of the crime charged. The prosecution presents its case first, and may call witnesses and present other evidence against the defendant. After the prosecution rests, the defense may move to dismiss the case if there is insufficient evidence, or present its case and call witnesses. All witnesses may be cross-examined by the opposing side. The defendant is not required to testify under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, but must answer the prosecution's questions if he or she takes the stand. After both sides have presented their cases and made closing arguments, the judge gives the jury legal instructions and they adjourn to deliberate in private. The jury must unanimously agree on a verdict of guilty or not guilty.
Criminal case procedure dictates that if a defendant is found guilty, sentencing follows, often at a separate hearing after the prosecution, defense, and court have developed information based on which the judge will craft a sentence. In capital cases, a separate "penalty phase" occurs, in which the jury determines whether to recommend that the death penalty should be imposed. As with the guilt phase, the burden is on the prosecution to prove its case, and the defendant is entitled to take the stand in his or her own defense, and may call witnesses and present evidence.
After sentencing, the defendant may appeal the ruling to a higher court. American appellate courts do not retry the case; they only examine the record of the proceedings in the lower court to determine if errors were made that require a new trial, re-sentencing, or a complete discharge of the defendant, as is mandated by the circumstances. The prosecution may not appeal after an acquittal, although it may appeal under limited circumstances before verdict is rendered, and may also appeal from the sentence itself.
Case Procedure News
• Ergenekon File In Supreme Court Turkey Telegraph
Ergenekon file in Supreme Court Turkey Telegraph The General Assembly of the Supreme Court, with the title of the Supreme Council, the former chief of staff Ilker Basbug, Dursun Cicek, Hasan Iunnn and Nusret Tadelen 19 defendants, including the 39 Ergenekon 39 case, will do the preliminary
• Labour Councilaposs Jihadi Cover Girl: Sacked Beauty Queenturnedterrorist Who...
Daily Mail Labour council39s jihadi cover girl: Sacked beauty queen turned terrorist who was jailed for helping 21/7 Tube attack Daily Mail A council worker who was sacked after a conviction for aiding a terrorist came to light did make the authority aware of her past but HR errors meant her past slipped through the net. Mulumebet Girma was jailed for helping failed suicide bomber Council admits failing to investigate former worker with terror convictionITV News all 10 news articles raquo
• Key Moments From Michelle Carteraposs Trial And Sentencing After She Encourag...
PEOPLE.com Key Moments From Michelle Carter39s Trial and Sentencing After She Encouraged Boyfriend39s Suicide PEOPLE.com On July 13, 2014, authorities found the body of Conrad Roy III, 18, in his pickup truck parked outside a Kmart in Fairhaven, Massachusetts. He apparently had killed himself by attaching a hose from a portable generator and filling the truck39s cab with 39I love you. Kill yourself.39The Boston Globe all 113 news articles raquo
• Doctor Watched Surgery On YouTube Before Fatal Procedure: Suit New York Post
New York Post Doctor watched surgery on YouTube before fatal procedure: suit New York Post Any patient would want to know has my doctor been accused of a serious crime, Dodson said. Spartanburg Regional Healthcare System, the owner of Union Medical Center, said that Sorour was a temporary employee, according to WSPA. He is no longer
• The Proscription Of IPOB: Was The Government Right After All By Job Sunday S...
SaharaReporters.com The Proscription Of IPOB: Was The Government Right After All By Job Sunday SaharaReporters.com The procedure followed in the instant is in line with the express provision of the foregoing section of TPAA. In further support of Federal Government39s case, under Section 62 1 and 2 of the Criminal Code Act, IPOB would clearly qualify as an and more raquo
The information provided by FactsOfLaw.com does not
constitute legal advice or any other type of advice and is
provided for educational purposes only without
warranty of any kind. FactsOfLaw.com has not
reviewed the information on this page for accuracy
and is not responsible for any errors, omissions or
inaccuracies. For legal advice you should
consult a licensed attorney. Source: wikipedia.org